I didn’t get a reply from Palm, so I rang them up again. It seems they didn’t receive my picture, so the support agent said he would send me an e-mail and that I should reply to it with the picture as an attachment.
Their e-mail came to the wrong address. Fortunately, I received it anyway (through good luck rather than anything else), and replied correcting them on the e-mail address and my name. They had managed to get my name as “Ford Berex”. Hmm
Anyway, later on, Palm responded;
A cracked screen is an out of warranty case. The out of warranty repair would cost 110,00 GBP.
Not happy, I e-mailed them back;
I understand that normally the display is not covered by warranty repair. In the “Cracked/Broken Display” section on your website it says;
‘Screen “breakages” normally involve cracking of the glass based digitiser and occur when the unit is subjected to physical stresses that are inconsistent with the device’s normal use.’
In this case there has been no “abnormal” use. I put the phone down on the table after making a call and upon picking it up the display was cracked. I live alone, so no one else had touched the phone and there are no pets in my house! As you may be able to see from the photograph, the phone is in immaculate condition (ignoring the cracked display), without a single scratch. The fault was not caused by misuse, an accident or by not following the instructions.
I would like the device to be repaired without cost to me.
This morning I got a reply. I was stunned!
I understand your point. Shit happens at times. The problem is that a cracked scren is a cracked screen.
So I’m afraid to say, but its still out of warranty.
Fortunately, I don’t take offence easily, but that is just unprofessional!
So, my next legal recourse is with Expansys, who I bought the device from. I wrote to them this morning;
I have spoken with Palm Technical Support. They have advised me that a cracked display is not covered by their warranty. Whilst I would like to continue taking this up with them, I am aware that under the Sale of Goods Act, the responsibility for goods which are not of satisfactory quality lies with the retailer, so my only legal recourse is with Expansys.
Could you advise me how I can get a repair or replacement of my Treo 680 without any cost to me?
They replied to me;
Thankyou for your e-mail regarding the damaged Palm Treo 680. Having checked with returns eXpansys would not be able to accept this device back for replacement due to the nature of the problem with the item. If the goods have been damaged in any way then the device would only be eligible for repair.
The device would need to be assessed by Palm who would conclude whether or not the fault would be covered under the warranty, As they have informed you that the fault would not be covered by the warranty we see no other alternative than to send the device back to them for anything but a chargable repair.
The return can be handled by eXpansys who will ship the device to Palm on your behalf however the turnaround is normally much quicker if you go directly to palm.
They seem to have forgotten their obligations under the Sale of Goods Act, so I reminded them;
I am not satisfied with a chargeable repair. I will be satisfied by a repair or replacement with no cost to me.
Palm’s Warranty does not affect my rights as a consumer. Under the Sale of Goods Act, wherever goods are bought they must “conform to contract”. This means they must be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality (i.e. not inherently faulty at the time of sale). Aspects of quality include fitness for purpose, freedom from minor defects, appearance and finish, durability and safety.
I believe that my phone was inherently faulty at the time of sale as it was not of satisfactory quality in respect of its durability. The 2 week old device was placed on a table after making a call and the next time I came to use it the display had a crack in one of the layers.
Also under the Sale of Goods Act it is the seller, not the manufacturer, who is responsible if goods do not conform to contract.
As I have requested a repair or replacement in the first six months after contract it is the seller (Expansys) to prove that the goods did conform to contract.
If you are unable to repair or replace the phone, I may have to try and make a claim against you through the small claims court. That is something that I am willing to do, but I would prefer to avoid.
They’ve not responded yet. I’ll update when they do.
Recent Comments